Part II: What is the gospel?
With the help of this paradigm (described in Part 1), let us ponder another situation. Acts 4:12 tells us that there is no other name than that of Jesus by which we must be saved. If we, as Christians, accept this as true, what does it really mean? Does everyone need to know certain facts about Jesus to be saved? Or, maybe, does this mean that Jesus is the agent of salvation whether we know it or not?
What about Abraham? He didn’t know Jesus. He had faith in the Creator God (Jesus) whom he knew through creation and revelation, and submitted himself to him (a living faith that responded, i.e. repentance, a change in direction). Cornelius also prayed and helped the poor as an outflow of his recognition of, and service to a Creator (Acts 10). Of course he was eventually taught additional truth about Jesus, which he gladly received. But, he was pleasing to God even before knowing about and “receiving” Jesus!
Is there a framework active today where people who don’t know about Jesus recognize and submissively serve a Creator? (Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, etc.?) What does God do with these folks? Does he have a framework of truth that fits them that differs from the Christian framework?
Or, what about the person who rejects a greatly distorted image of Jesus presented by well meaning “Christians”, but goes on to live in submission to the Creator (Jesus) without embracing a particular theological formula?
If we take the traditional Evangelical approach that says without a “saving knowledge” of Jesus Christ, the “lost” are condemned already to an eternity without God, I then have to ask, “How much does someone need to know about Jesus to be ‘saved’?”
The disciples, who carried the good news of Jesus into the surrounding villages during the ministry of Jesus on earth didn’t know anything about the death and resurrection of Jesus (Matthew 10). They weren’t even sure Jesus was the Messiah. Yet, they spread the “gospel”. What was their message? What good was it (in modern Evangelical terms) if it didn’t tell the people that Jesus had died for their sins?
The message was one of a new kingdom, a different way of relating to others, as taught by Jesus during the Sermon on the Mount. The call was to change directions in life and serve God and others. The call was to be part of God’s kingdom, not the kingdom of man. The call was to return to the way Adam and Eve lived and communed with God before the fall. This was the call that Abraham accepted, apart from “knowing” the name of Jesus or about the resurrection.
Even after the resurrection, the early church couldn’t agree for quite a while whether Jesus was God, or simply the Messiah. The Nicene Creed affirming that Jesus was God was written in 325 CE, after centuries of debate on the topic. Were those early “believers” not believers if they followed Jesus only as Messiah, even though they didn’t recognize him as God? If we agree they were true believers, then how about the sincere people today who are involved in groups like the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Mormons, who diligently seek to serve God, and to follow Jesus and apply his teachings, but yet don’t believe Jesus is God, but rather that he is the son of God, a distinct entity?
I am glad I am not the judge! God judges the hearts and intents of each man.
But what then is the message that we are to spread around the world in our effort to make disciples of all nations?
What is the gospel?
I find that the narrative approach to the Bible makes more sense when I try to decide what my role is as a Christian. I am to tell God’s story by my life and with my words. He created the world perfectly. Man messed it up, and God has been working toward putting it back the way he intended ever since. He sent Jesus to show us the way to live, and to die for all of creation. There was something beyond our comprehension accomplished in the death and resurrection of Jesus that opens the way to restoration. Our job now is to live out and tell God’s story, to invite others to be part of the restoration process, to take on the hard work of living life according to God’s rules, not the world’s rules, for Jesus is the true King, who is eventually coming again to finally put everything “to rights”.
So how do we do this in practice? We need to be living our life with Kingdom values as our rule and practice. We need to approach others, as Paul did in Athens, at the point of intersection of their worldview and ours (assuming ours is more correct; with more truth and less error than theirs), and invite them to follow the Creator, to participate in his counter cultural Kingdom, which he revealed and established through Jesus. This is an invitation to change directions, to take up the hard job of living differently than those around us, to be a peculiar people, and to serve the real Ruler of the universe. This is not accomplished through a simple prayer, or accepting the applicability of a few verses of Scripture juxtaposed in a linear analytical manner presented persuasively. It requires a change that takes place over time, a lifetime; one of ups and downs.
A well-prepared verbal or visual presentation of “the gospel” may “hook” a few people into a “decision” to follow Jesus, which may or may not be real or lasting. But more likely, our life of consistent (not perfect) application of Kingdom truth will attract the interest of those who notice a difference, and recognize in their conscience (as the Holy Spirit works) that there is some truth in what we live and speak. When they decide to follow Jesus, it will more likely be thought out, and with greater conviction and duration. They will already have an idea of what being a disciple is by observing the sacrificial, serving and loving life of the body of Christ, which they now too desire to be a part.
So, I probably have raised more questions than answers. I welcome the thought and input of others who can give me counsel and direction, to help me weed out my error and find the truth for our time.